Sometimes you can also improve the legibility of different signs and text. Brick walls, cobblestones, and other objects with a lot of thick and thin lines come out looking fine. The results delivered by Super Resolution are also largely dependent on the objects featured in the image. Enhancing details in photos that you plan to crop drastically.Upscaling older photos and significantly cropped pictures to produce higher quality prints.In reality, Super Resolution is mainly beneficial for the following purposes: If you're simply posting photos on Instagram or Facebook, this function won't be of any use. That said, there aren't that many cases where this feature is required. If you need more proof, check out the relevant post on Adobe’s official blog. The Adobe Photoshop new Super Resolution function relies on machine learning to boost the resolution of your photos while providing higher quality results than all of its competitors. Right-click on the image (or hold the Command or Control key while clicking) and pick Enhance. Take an image, import it into Lightroom, and complete these straightforward steps to enhance its resolution:ġ. However, if you aren’t limited in the amount of storage space you can use, that shouldn’t be an issue. That’s why many photographers prefer to apply this feature to individual photos rather than entire batches. Since the applied enhancement is non-destructive, you risk nothing by trying it out as long as you remember that increasing the resolution of a photo by 4 requires a significantly larger amount of storage space. It’s not hidden behind multiple menus and complex toolbars and doesn’t force you to learn dozens of parameters that need to be adjusted before you can get the result you want. One of the most attractive aspects of Super Resolution is how convenient it is. Thankfully, as of June 2021, this feature was integrated into the software. For instance, one of the journalists already tried this feature on 102MP photos taken with Fujifilm GFX 100 and GFX 100S cameras and has managed to create stunning 400MP images.įor the first couple of months, using the Adobe Camera Super Resolution function in Lightroom was incredibly difficult. Note: The Super Resolution feature allows increasing the resolution of any RAW format file up to 4 times as long as the resulting megapixel count doesn’t go above 500. Pentax Pixel Shift Resolution (PSR) files.Photographs taken with a Fujifilm camera with a mosaic SR, EXR, or 2x4 matrix.Photos taken with a camera supplied with a Foveon matrix.Linear DNG images (including HDR and panoramic DNG images that were previously created in Lightroom or Camera Raw).Non-RAW formats (JPEG, TIFF, and HEIC).The developer has also clearly listed what type of files won’t be compatible with the Adobe Photoshop new Super Resolution feature: Instead of relying on classic upsampling technologies like Preserve Details and Bicubic Smoother, Super Resolution employs AI upsampling tech that is claimed to have been trained on “millions of images” to provide previously unseen result quality. So it's six of one, half a dozen of the other.The Adobe Camera Super Resolution function doubles the linear resolution of an image by quadrupling the overall pixel count while providing superior results compared to all existing upsampling methods. I therefore find that results from the above procedure are roughly equivalent to what I would get by doing a 'straight' conversion using a better demosaicing and sharpening engine (I've been using Rawtherapee). Having said that, I personally find that a fair bit of detail and acutance is lost early on, as a result of Adobe's demosaicing engine being less than optimal in terms of detail interpretation. The idea of having AI-invented details in my images fills me with horror, as I'm sure it does many photographers, but used in this way, it doesn't feel much different to any other post-processing technique. So I'm essentially thinking about it as a sophisticated sharpening tool, and viewed as such, it works pretty well. However, if I resample the result down to the original size, stack it above the straight conversion and set the transparency to around 50%, the artifice is hidden sufficiently, whilst leaving some improvement to the apparent acutance of details over standard sharpening techniques. Generally, I find that its 'naked' output is not acceptable 'as is' - just too many artificial-looking details and textures. I've been doing quite a bit of raw conversion recently, and being trying out Adobe super res as I go along.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |